Foster Farms Bowl Film Study – Offense

Courtesy mercurynews.com

I’m not going to dwell on the final game coordinated by the lesser of the two Kevins, but the Foster Farms Bowl happened, therefore the film must be studied.

 

Participation Report

  • Based on this game alone, one could draw the conclusion that the Bacon ‘N Legs personnel was Kevin Wilson’s baby and/or Coach Allen wasn’t a huge fan. Tyler Natee did not see the field at all, and Zander Diamont played just 3 snaps – and threw a long TD to Nick Westbrook on one of them.
  • Ricky Brookins was the clear second option at running back, and he saw more action than he has all year, in part because Devine Redding’s goalline fumble in the 2nd quarter earned him a spot on the bench. Devonte Williams returned from a late season injury and saw limited duty as well.
  • Along the offensive line, the injured linemen that we thought could possibly return for this game – Jacob Bailey and Brandon Knight – remained out. Redshirt freshman Simon Stepaniak handled most of the game at right guard, with Dan Feeney at right tackle. For three series in the 1st half, Delroy Baker came in at right tackle and Feeney moved to right guard.
  • At wideout, the trio of Ricky Jones, Nick Westbrook and Mitchell Paige actually rotated a little less than they had for most of the season. Luke Timian was the most frequent sub for both Westbrook and Paige. Donovan Hale occasionally spelled Jones. Camion Patrick saw just a few snaps at wideout after missing the Purdue game.

The Running Game Was…Fine

In total, IU’s 33 called runs totaled 134 yards, good for 4.1 yard per carry. Against a slightly above average rushing defense, this was an average to below-average rushing performance by a team with a rushing attack that, for the entire season, was outright bad. In that sense, IU’s rushing performance was probably slightly better than we had any right to expect. When he wasn’t fumbling inside the Utah 5, Devine Redding ran hard. Ricky Brookins had some strong outside runs, while also picking up tough yards between the tackles.

Schematically, there were a few small differences in Wilson’s absence (more counters, some tackle pull), but the bread-and-butter of inside and outside zone remained the same. The biggest shift was the abandonment of the Bacon ‘N Legs or any other Wildcat-style personnel (like we saw with Camion Patrick against Michigan). For a team that struggled to run the ball conventionally throughout the season and that had some success with these other schemes, I found this a little surprising.

The Passing Game Was Decidedly NOT FINE

First off, Lagow’s receivers didn’t do him any favors. Five drops was a season high. Devine Redding’s drop of a perfectly set up screen pass was particularly costly. Had Redding brought it in, there was no one between him and a big gain and possibly a TD.

As you will note on the chart, however, four of the five drops came on short passes. IU’s downfield passing woes rest more squarely on Lagow’s shoulders.¬†On passes that traveled more than 10 yards downfield, Lagow was 5 of 15 for 69 yards (4.6 YPA), with 1 TD and 1 INT. This on the heels of a 2 for 9 performance on such passes against Purdue. Suffice to say, Richard did not end the season on a high note.

And this wasn’t a protection issue. Going into IU’s last drive, the O-line had allowed just 6 pressures on 36 dropbacks for a pressure percentage of just 17%. Against a defensive line with the pass rushing talent of Utah, a 17% pressure percentage is good to quite good. 1

Simply put, Richard Lagow must improve in 2017. In fact, with a new offensive coordinator and QBs coach, if he doesn’t show improvement in his decision-making, accuracy, mechanics and pocket presence as soon as this spring, he could find himself in a battle for playing time with Austin King or Peyton Ramsey in August.

Share on Facebook2Tweet about this on Twitter